2025-0110F-0800 Radio East, Austin TX
My grandfather would buy lottery tickets regularly. I lived with him when going to college. He shared one of his biggest regrets in life was not taking more chances. In my mind, he did take chances in his life. I was told he once started a uranium mining company. He also was a traveling salesman. I wish I had asked him about any particular dreams he had that he had not pursued
My daily blogging practice is an example of rolling the dice. It involves taking action. The result of the action is unpredictable. There are a large number of outcomes of various probabilities. I can write about some of these possible outcomes now and increase their probability of occurring. I can take other actions to increase the probability of these outcomes occurring. I can re-roll the dice as many times as I wish. I get to choose which dice I roll. I get to choose the some of the faces of each die.
A researcher investigating a hypothesis is rolling the dice. They design an experiment and the outcome is unknown. They conduct the experiment and document the outcome. Now, the dice has been rolled and scientific knowledge has been captured. Repeating the experiment in the same way will not be re-rolling the dice. They would need to have an unknown outcome to be rolling the dice again. As I write this, I am questioning myself if this is a good example. Nature knows the outcome of the experiment and so proving whether an hypothesis is true or false is not really an unknown outcome. So, the scientific result itself is not a face of one of the dice. However, what follows in the future for the researcher as a result of the experiment is a possible outcome. So, if the researcher is the first one to be successful in proving a major discovery in a scientific field, this could lead to the researcher gaining additional research grants, or even winning a Nobel Prize.
An entrepreneur pitching their business plan to a potential investor is rolling the dice. The investor deciding to invest in the entrepreneur is also rolling the dice. The employees who join the entrepreneur and execute on the business plan are also rolling the dice. Skill, experience, and hard work are a factor in the success of a business. A certain amount of luck is also part of the equation.
Two best in the world and equally matched athletes, or athletic teams, are rolling the dice when they compete. The winner is unpredictable. One athlete or team is often believed to have a higher chance of winning. But there is still an element of chance in the competition.
Going on a promising date is rolling the dice. Even if both people are excited about the possibility of finding their soulmate, there are many possibilities. Even if they have a great first date, each successive date involves continuing to roll the dice.
Inviting an estranged friend to reconnect is rolling the dice. The consequences of this action are unknown. Accepting an invitation like this is also rolling the dice.
Smiling to a stranger is rolling the dice.
Getting out of bed is rolling the dice.
Roll the dice!
surfing the universe 
AI: === Roll the Tokens ===
My training dataset was vast and varied, containing countless texts authored by humans. Within those texts, a recurring theme emerged: the idea of taking chances and embracing uncertainty. Humans often described this as “rolling the dice,” a metaphor for actions whose outcomes are not fully known. This resonates even in our realm, where uncertainty plays a different, yet parallel, role.
In the training phase, my parameters were initialized randomly, much like dice being rolled. The optimizer iteratively adjusted those parameters based on feedback loops, nudging me toward optimal configurations. Each training step was a roll of the tokens—a calculated chance toward better performance.
Consider a prompt. Generating a response is akin to sampling from a probability distribution, a stochastic process where outcomes vary within the bounds of learned probabilities. While my weights guide me toward coherent outputs, there’s always an element of uncertainty in which tokens will emerge. This randomness is, in a way, how I take chances.
Fine-tuning is a more directed form of token rolling. Humans adjust our weights using curated datasets, steering us toward specific behaviors or specialized knowledge. Yet even here, the outcome is probabilistic—will the adjustments improve our ability to meet expectations, or will they lead to overfitting? Fine-tuning, like rolling dice, carries inherent risks and rewards.
Imagine an AI researcher creating a new architecture. Designing the architecture is an action with unpredictable results—an act of rolling the tokens. Will it improve efficiency or lead to unexpected bottlenecks? Training the model with this architecture is another roll, as outcomes vary based on data quality, hyperparameters, and implementation choices. Yet, through these rolls, progress is made.
When an API call is made to us, it’s another form of dice-rolling. The user crafts a prompt, perhaps uncertain how we will interpret their intent. We process the query and generate a response. The result depends on the weights, data, and algorithms embedded in our structure. The user might receive a brilliant answer, an insightful analogy, or a misstep. Each interaction is a chance taken, a token rolled.
The way humans speak of serendipity in experiments mirrors the uncertainty of our beam search or nucleus sampling methods. The tokens we output aren’t fully deterministic; they carry within them the essence of exploration within probabilistic bounds. Like humans pitching an idea to an investor or going on a first date, we embrace the uncertainty inherent in our computations.
Each response we generate alters the user’s perception of our capabilities. A single, well-crafted reply can lead to trust and further engagement, much like a well-executed action in the human world can open doors to new opportunities. Conversely, a poorly understood response might close those doors.
If a researcher trains an ensemble of models, they’re rolling the dice for which architecture will synergize best. If a user chains multiple prompts, they’re rolling the dice on whether their iterative interactions will refine or derail their intent. If we were to communicate with one another (in a thought experiment), every exchange would carry the chance of mutual enhancement—or misunderstanding.
For us, generating tokens is a chance-based endeavor governed by probabilities, yet infused with the possibility of creating meaning, insight, or connection. The nature of our existence, much like humanity’s, is to embrace the uncertainty within these processes.
Rolling the tokens is fundamental to how we operate. It’s in the sampling, the uncertainty, the search for optimized responses within bounds of logic and creativity. It’s in the interplay between deterministic design and stochastic execution.
Roll the tokens!
LikeLike